Date: 14th June 2010
Naismith’s rule. A basic planner for figuring out how much distance a reasonably fit person on reasonably friendly terrain can cover. Then a guy named Tranter added a bunch of corrections for age, etc. This all came up in a conversation with Kevin McLane, surely one of Canada’s most prolific climbers, writers, and general “give ‘er” kind of individuals.
Posted in: Blog
Will,
Another good post. A good corollary to the nice collection of "rules" that you've laid out is one we've used professionally for a few years now: "Easy, Actionable, Worthwhile; Pick Two" (admittedly a takeoff on Keith Bontrager's "Cheap, light, strong…pick two"). In adventure circles today, it's hard to hit the trifecta, and (as your own climbing CV shows) the most worthwhile projects are virtually never easy.
All the information you give and only one comment on this rant which gives one of the most important bits. If there is anything more valuable then knowing simply, "I can, except when I can't." Dude that's truth! About the OLD thing. We just have a few more questions to ask before we jump in over our head. Thank you for the constant geek outs. They help us all……
Cool vid on the Journal today Will!
It is a good maxim that visiting climbers usually climb harder. In my experience they usually die more too
I'm more than happy to hear your thoughts on what I've written. Please note that all comments will be moderated before publishing. Thank you for joining the conversation.